top of page

Viewpoints Blog

Through Member collaboration, MCRA helps drive performance improvements, deliver exceptional service, transform care, and champion the health and wellbeing of the communities we collectively serve.

Effect of Matching Therapists to Patients vs Assignment as Usual on Adult Psychotherapy Outcomes

A Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA Psychiatry June 9, 2021

MCRA Member, Outcome Referrals, latest research is published by JAMA:

Key Points

Question Can assigning patients to therapists with empirically determined strengths in treating the patients’ specific mental health problem(s) (ie, measurement-based matching) improve the outcomes of naturalistic psychotherapy compared with case assignment as usual?

Findings In this 2-arm, double-blind randomized clinical trial including 48 therapists and 218 outpatients, measurement-based matching promoted significantly greater reductions in patients’ general symptomatic and functional impairment, global psychological distress, and domain-specific impairment on patients’ most elevated presenting problem over 16 weeks postintake.

Meaning In this study, mental health care was enhanced by prospectively assigning patients to empirically good-fitting therapists, which requires minimal disruptions within a mental health care system.

Download Full Report:
2021 Constantino et al. _JAMA Psychiatry
Download PDF • 376KB

32 views0 comments


bottom of page